نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 هیات علمی گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه یاسوج
2 دانشجو آموخته دکتری، گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه یاسوج
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction: The main purpose of this study is to compare the views of social scientists and experts, and the public views on the phenomenon of social malingering and its contexts of formation in social interactions and everyday life.
Research Method: This research is a qualitative study that examines the views of social scientists and public views on the phenomenon of social malingering and its contexts of formation in everyday life using the method of comparative analysis.
Finding: According to social science experts, in a society where there is a lack of ontological security, bad governance, ideological morality, individuality cult, weakening of social morality, and anomaly of individuals and reference groups, members of society are protesting and they do social malingering. from a public point of view, social malingering in the oscillation among disintegration and social dependency is also a strategy for survival in conditions of social anomy.
Results & Conclusion: This cases oriented qualitative and comparative study shows that public views support the Perspective of experts; the difference is that, in the specialized perspectives among social scientists, the emphasis is on the central phenomenon of protest against cultural and social conditions, but in the public views among common people, the emphasis is on survival strategies that lead to both the survival of individuals and the survival of society; thus, social malingering in the oscillation among disintegration and social dependency is a strategy for survival in conditions of social anomy.
کلیدواژهها [English]
', './data/csr/coversheet/cover_fa.jpg'))