Modeling Students’ Academic Procrastination and Coping Strategies based on Data-Based Theory

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran (Corresponding Author).

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 PhD student in Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Studying academic procrastination among students can provide scientific support and necessary decision-making strategies for higher education institutions to promote students’ mental health. This study aimed to model academic procrastination among graduate students and identify strategies for dealing with it, through a qualitative approach and using data-based theory. A total of 15 faculty members participated in this study and were interviewed purposefully and based on the rule of theoretical saturation. Data analysis was conducted based on three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. Scientific and research incompetence, inefficiency of the university system (weak mechanisms of the student recruitment system, ineffective management and educational laws, weak effective communication between the university and industry and society, and lack of justification education), the labor market and job opportunities are among the causal conditions for the formation of procrastination. In contrast, students use passive or active strategies (adaptive strategy and illegitimate opportunity strategy) against procrastination. Social beliefs, the existence of shortcuts, family support, and academic alienation of professors as intervening conditions, and the nature of academic disciplines (in the humanities and basic sciences), lack of scientific and research equipment, multiple roles, and in-person or virtual education as background conditions affect strategies. The consequences of this behavior are the weakening of scientific credibility and professional ethics, and the weakening of the cultural capital of society. In general, continuous procrastination behavior can be a meaningful response to social, cultural, and organizational conditions. This behavior is not only a result of individual factors, but also a reaction to macrostructures and social expectations, which at the same time indicates individual agency in managing the situation. 
Keywords: Educational Policymaking, Academic Procrastination, Graduate Students, Data-Based Theory.
 
1. Introduction
Studying academic procrastination among students can provide scientific support and necessary decision-making strategies for higher education institutions to promote students’ mental health.
The recent occurrence of a public crisis, such as COVID-19, has had unprecedented impacts on all levels of education (Toquero, 2020), particularly affecting students’ psychological well-being and learning. The challenge of COVID-19 not only disrupts students’ academic and daily lives, but also exacerbates the problems of academic procrastination (Gamage et al., 2020; Tarkar, 2020). Since, in addition to the delay in graduation, students, even highly motivated individuals, may procrastinate on some tasks at some point in time, it is important to scientifically examine why and how this issue occurs. It also seems that personality and psychological factors explain only a part of student procrastination, and social, economic, cultural, environmental, and organizational conditions, in addition to individual factors, can greatly stimulate or mediate learner behavior (Steele and Klingsick, 2016), because learning and studying in higher education usually takes place in some kind of social system and is often organized in a system of social actions (Kappenburg and Klingsick, 2022). Therefore, examining organizational policies and culture, academic skills and abilities, social needs and expectations, and other environmental and cultural factors, along with personality variables, helps to provide a comprehensive analysis of student procrastination. Procrastination, or more precisely, academic procrastination, is not considered in this study as an individual characteristic variable or a generalized habit, but rather at the individual, academic, and societal levels. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at the individual for the phenomenon of academic procrastination, the aim of the present study is also to identify other variables that are beyond the individual’s control and cause procrastination. So far, no similar sociological study has been conducted in Iran that seeks to examine the concept of academic procrastination and discover the specific experiences of the professors’ group in relation to students. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to study academic procrastination with a sociological approach from the perspective of faculty members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz and to present a paradigmatic model based on the grounded theory method. 
 
2. Materials and Methods
This research was conducted using a qualitative grounded theory method. The study population was faculty members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, who were selected as participants due to their direct experience with students and awareness of their academic challenges. Sampling was purposive and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Finally, 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members. The data were analyzed in three stages: open, axial, and selective coding. In the open coding stage, raw data were transformed into primary concepts. In the axial coding stage, these concepts were organized around the main axes, and finally, in the selective coding stage, the core category was identified and expanded.

3. Data
The research findings showed that academic procrastination among graduate students as a purposeful action is rooted in structural and organizational causes. The paradigmatic model presented in this study includes causal conditions, contexts, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences of procrastination.
Causal conditions: These conditions include knowledge disability (poverty of scientific knowledge), research disability, and inefficiency of the university system, labor market, and job opportunities. Knowledge disability refers to weakness in academic reading and lack of scientific inference and analysis. Research disability is also related to students’ lack of mastery of research methods and weakness in knowledge production. Inefficiency of the university system includes weakness of student recruitment mechanisms, ineffective management and educational laws, weak university-industry and community relations, and lack of justification training.
- Contexts: This section includes the nature of academic disciplines, multiple roles, in-person or virtual education, and lack of scientific and research equipment. The nature of academic disciplines, especially in the fields of basic sciences and humanities, can affect the level of procrastination. The multiplicity of roles of students (such as family or work responsibilities) can also lead to role conflict and increased procrastination.
- Intervening conditions: These conditions include family support, the presence of intergenerational patterns, social beliefs, and academic alienation of the professor. Family support can affect students’ motivation and behavior, while the presence of intergenerational patterns and social beliefs such as degree orientation can lead to a decrease in academic motivation. Academic alienation of the professor can also help to reinforce procrastination.
- Strategies: Students use two types of strategies when faced with procrastination: passive and active. Passive strategies include giving up and avoiding assignments, while active strategies include adaptive strategies (such as trying to catch up) and illicit opportunities (such as buying a thesis or copying). Consequences: Academic procrastination can lead to the weakening of academic credibility and professional ethics, the reduction of the cultural capital of society, and the reproduction of incompetent individuals. These consequences not only affect students’ academic performance, but also have negative effects on social and economic structures.
 
4. Discussion
His present study showed that academic procrastination is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is rooted in the interaction of individual, structural, organizational, cultural, and social factors. This phenomenon not only affects students’ academic performance, but also has broad implications for society. To effectively deal with this phenomenon, a comprehensive and multidimensional approach is needed that, in addition to reforming educational structures, also pays attention to cultural and social changes. The findings of this study can be used as a basis for future research and educational policy-making at the macro level. It is suggested that reviewing educational practices, strengthening university relations with industry and society, and teaching research skills to students should be considered as effective strategies to reduce academic procrastination.
 
5. Conclusion
In general, persistent procrastination can be a meaningful response to social, cultural, and organizational conditions. This behavior is not only a result of individual factors, but also a reaction to macrostructures and social expectations, which at the same time indicates individual agency in managing the situation.
In general, the continuous performance of procrastination behavior can be a meaningful response to social, cultural, and organizational conditions. This behavior is not only a result of individual factors, but also a reaction to macrostructures and social expectations, which at the same time indicates individual agency in managing the conditions. Students’ behavior in the face of procrastination is a combination of structural and agency influences. Some students avoid completing tasks by adopting passive strategies, while others try to compensate for their shortcomings by using active or illegitimate strategies. These behaviors reflect the complex interaction between the inefficient structures of the educational system and the individual agency of students. To improve this situation, it is necessary to review student recruitment policies, define clear educational goals, strengthen interaction between professors and students, and promote a meritocratic culture. In conclusion, it can be said that academic procrastination is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is rooted in the interaction of individual, structural, organizational, cultural, and social factors. This phenomenon not only affects students’ academic performance, but also has widespread consequences for society. To effectively deal with this phenomenon, a comprehensive and multidimensional approach is required that, in addition to reforming educational structures, also pays attention to cultural and social changes. The findings of this study can be used as a basis for future research and educational policymaking at the macro level.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

- آزادارمکی، تقی، (1397). دانشگاه و چالش‌های جامعۀ ایرانی. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی. 
- بوردیو، پیر، (1393). نظریه کنش: دلایل عملی و انتخاب عقلانی. ترجمۀ مرتضی مردیها، تهران: نقش و نگار. 
- بهرام‌پور، محمدپیام، (1395). از شنبه: راهنمای علمی و کاربردی از اهمال‌کاری و تنبلی تا موفقیت. تهران: تعالی. 
- پیروزان، علیرضا، (1400). سواد دانشگاهی و دانشگاه ایرانی. تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی. 
- حریریان‌توکلی، الهام؛ فراستخواه، مقصود؛ شیرزادکبریا، بهارک؛ حمیدی‌فر، فاطمه، (1401). «گذار از حکمروایی دولت‌گرا به حکمروایی خوب آموزش‌عالی؛ الگوی برخاسته از نظریه بر پایه (GT)». پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش‌عالی، 28 (4): 43-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/irphe.2022.705220
- حسین‌قلی‌زاده، رضوان، (1390). «تناسب آموزش‌عالی با تأکید بر نقش اجتماعی دانشگاه در جامعه دانش‌محور». نامه آموزش‌عالی، 4(13): 121-142. https://journal.sanjesh.org/article_15549.html
- خواجه‌دادمیر، آرزو؛ ناستی‌زایی، ناصر؛ و پورقاز، عبدالوهاب، (1395). «رابطه مدیریت کلاس با اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی». توسعۀ آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 9(23): 10-19. 
- ذکایی، محمدسعید؛ و اسماعیلی، محمدجواد، (1394). جوانان و بیگانگی تحصیلی و دانشگاهی. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
- روشن‌زاده، مصطفی؛ تاج‌آبادی، علی؛ مظهری‌دهکردی، بهاره؛ محمدی، سمیه، (1401). «بررسی اثر پیش‌بینی‌کننده اعتیاد به اینترنت بر اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی دانشجویان دانشکدۀ پرستاری». اطلاع‌رسانی پزشکی نوین، ۸ (۱): ۳۵-۲۶. https://dx.doi.org/10.32598/JMIS.8.1.4
- سلیمانی، اسماعیل؛ نارویی، یعقوب؛ فتاحی، ستار؛ و مقدم، علی، (1396). «رابطه اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی و ابعاد آن با اعتیاد به اینترنت در دانشجویان با توجه به جنسیت و فرهنگ ایرانی». اولین کنفرانس بین المللی فرهنگ، آسیب‌شناسی روانی و تربیت، تهران.
- اسدی، سونا؛ و محمدوند، زهرا، (۱۴۰۳). «بررسی رابطه اخلاق‌ورزی با اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی و نگرش به تقلب (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارومیه)». تحقیقات راهبردی در تعلیم و آموزش و پرورش، 15(4): 45-59.‎
- شارع‌پور، محمود، (1385). جامعه‌شناسی آموزش و پرورش. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).
- صادقی، حمیده؛ جانعلی‌پور، مجتبی؛ قربان‌پور، امیر؛ محمدی‌رازی، محمود؛ بخشی‌پور، اعظم، (1401). «مدل‌یابی اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی براساس اضطراب کووید-19 با نقش میانجی اعتیاد به شبکه‌های اجتماعی در دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطه». مشاورۀ مدرسه، 2(4): 1-15. ‎  https://dx.doi.org/10.22098/jsc.2023.12554.1090
- عباس‌زاده، محمد؛ علیزاده‌اقدم، محمد باقر؛ و اسلامی‌بناب، سیدرضا، (1391). «بررسی رابطۀ بین سرمایۀ اجتماعی و آنومی اجتماعی». مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 1(1): 145-172. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2012.36551
- فاضلی، نعمت‌الله، (1397). «نوشتن خلاق: حلقه گمشده علوم انسانی تحلیلی از ضرورت توجه به نقش نوشتار در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی ایران». جامعه فرهنگ رسانه، 7(26): 46-58.
- عنایتی، ترانه؛ و رستگارتبار، فاطمه، (1396). «رابطه نگرش دانشجویان به دانشگاه و فرسودگی تحصیلی با میانجی‌گری اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی». گام‌های توسعه در آموزش، 14(1): 30-20.
- فکوهی، ناصر، (1384). «پیر بوردیو، پرسمان دانش و روشنفکری». علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، 5: 161-141. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.5251
- قانعی‌راد، محمدامین، (1385). «تعاملات دانشجویان, انگیزش و کنشگری رشته‌‎ای». پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش‌عالی، 12(2): 1-22. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702530.html
- قره‌آغاجی، سعید؛ واحدی، شهرام؛ فتحی‌آذر، اسکندر؛ و ادیب، یوسف، (1398). «تبیین اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان متوسطه: یک مطالعه نظریه زمینه‌ای». پژوهش در برنامه‌ریزی درسی، 16(60)، 173-193.
- محمدپور، احمد، (1400). ضد روش: زمینه‌های فلسفی و رویه‌های عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. چاپ چهارم. نشر لوگوس، تهران.
- نجاتی‌حسینی، سید محمود، (1396). شهروندی دانشگاهی در ایران. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
- نوغانی‌دخت‌بهمنی، محسن؛ محمدی، فردین؛ و کرمانی، مهدی، (1398). خلق نظریه در مطالعات کیفی (رویکردی کاربردی به نظریه زمینه‌ای). انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد.
- همتی، رضا، (1396). علم، دانشگاه و جامعه. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
- یگی، راهل، (1395). از خود‌بیگانگی: جهت‌گیری‌های جدید در نظریه انتقادی، ترجمۀ احمد تدین، تهران: انتشارات دنیای اقتصاد. 
- Abbaszadeh, M., Alizadeh Aghdam, M. B. & Eslami Bonab, S. R., (2012). “Investigating the relationship between social capital and social anomie”. Social Studies and Research in Iran, 1(1): 145-172. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2012.36551 (in Persian)
- Abramowski, A., (2018). “Is procrastination all that “bad”? A qualitative study of academic procrastination and self-worth in postgraduate university students”. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 46(2): 158–170. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1198168 
- Araya-Castillo, L., Burgos, M., González, P., Rivera, Y., Barrientos, N., Yáñez Jara, V. & Sáez, W., (2023). “Procrastination in university students: A proposal of a theoretical model”. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2): 128. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13020128.
- Asadi, S. & Mohammadvand, Z., (2014). “Investigating the relationship between ethics and academic procrastination and attitudes towards cheating (Case study: Islamic Azad University, Urmia Branch)”. Strategic Research in Education, 15(4): 45-59. https://www.doi.org/10.34785/J012.2022.011 (in Persian)
- Azad Aramaki, T., (2018). University and the Challenges of Iranian Society. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (in Persian)
- Azam, A., (2001). “Modeling academic procrastination based on COVID-19 anxiety with the mediating role of social media addiction in high school students”. School Counseling, 2(4), 1-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0018. (in Persian)
- Bahrampour, M. P., (2016). From Saturday: A Scientific and Practical Guide from Procrastination and Laziness to Success. Tehran: Ta'ala. https://www.ketabrah.ir (in Persian)
- Bourdieu, P., (2014). Theory of Action: Practical Reasons and Rational Choice. translated by: Morteza Mardiha, Tehran: Naqsh-e-Negar. https://opac.nlai.ir/opacprod/search/bibliographicAdvancedSearchProcess.do
- Chatrakamollathas, S., Moha, K. P. & Choochom, O., (2022). “Academic procrastination behavior among college undergraduates: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)”. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(1): 223-230. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/257019.
- Enayati, T. & Rastegartabar, F., (2017). “The Relationship between Students' Attitudes to University and Academic Burnout with the Mediation of Academic Procrastination”. Development Steps in Education 14(1): 30-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.5812/sdme.57819 (in Persian)
- Fakuhi, N., (2005). “Pierre Bourdieu, The Question of Knowledge and Enlightenment”. Journal of Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 5: 161-141. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.5251
- Fazli, N., (2018). “Creative Writing: The Missing Link of Humanities: An Analysis of the Necessity of Paying Attention to the Role of Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences of Iran”. Media Culture Society, 7(26): 46-58. https://www.jscm.ir/article_77451. (in Persian)
- Gamage, K. A., Silva, E. K. D. & Gunawardhana, N., (2020). “Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity”. Education Sciences, 10(11): 301. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390doi.org/educsci10110301. 
- Ghanei-Rad, M. A., (2006). “Student Interactions, Motivation and Activism in a Discipline”. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12(2): 1-22. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702530_en.html (in Persian)
- Ghare-Aghaji, S., Vahedi, S., Fathi Azar, E. & Adib, Y., (2019). “Explaining Academic Procrastination in High School Students: A Grounded Theory Study”. Research in Curriculum Planning, 16(60): 173-193. https://dx.doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2019.546268 (in Persian)
- Haririan Tavakoli, E., Farastkhah M., Shirzad Kobria, B. & HamidiFar, F., (2012). “Transition from State-Oriented Governance to Good Governance of Higher Education; a Model Based on Theory (GT)”. Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Research and Planning, 28 (4): 43-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/irphe.2022.705220 (in Persian)
- He, S., (2017). “A Multivariate Investigation into Academic Procrastination of University Students”. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5: 12-24. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.510002 
- Hemmati, R., (2017). Science, University and Society. Tehran: Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute: https://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/search/briefListSearch.do?command=FULL_VIEW&id=4923262&pageStatus=1&sortKeyValue1=sortkey_title&sortKeyValue2=sortkey_author (in Persian)
- Hossein Gholizadeh, R., (2011). “The Relevance of Higher Education with an Emphasis on the Social Role of the University in a Knowledge-Based Society”. Letter to Higher Education, 4(13): 121-142. https://journal.sanjesh.org/article_15549.html (in Persian)
- Kandemir, M., (2014). “Reasons of Academic Procrastination: Self-Regulation, Academic Self-Efficacy, Life Satisfaction and Demographics Variables”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152: 188-193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281405246X
- Karimi Moonaghi, H. & Baloochi Beydokhti, T., (2017). “Academic procrastination and its characteristics: A Narrative Review”. Future of Medical Education Journal, 7(2): 43-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.22038/fmej.2017.9049. (in Persian)
- Kazemi, M., Fayyazi, M. & Kaveh, M., (2010). “Investigation of procrastination prevalence and its causes among university managers and employees”. Journal of management research, 2(4): 42-63. https://tmj.um.ac.ir/article_25463.Doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v2i4.9078 (in Persian)
- Khajehdadmir, A., Nastizaei, N. & Pourghaz, A., (2016). “The relationship between classroom management and academic procrastination among postgraduate students”. Journal of Education Development in Medical Sciences, 9(23): 10-19. https://edujournal.zums.ac.ir//article-1-683-en.html (in Persian)
- Koppenborg, M. & Klingsieck K. B., (2022). “Social factors of procrastination: group work can reduce procrastination among students”.Social Psychology of Education, 25(1): 249-274. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-021-09682-3.
- Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P. & Smits, R. E., (2010). A systemic perspective: the innovation policy dance. Edward Elgar publishing. Cheltenham. https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/4181_1.html
- Li, H., Tian, D., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Li, R., Zhang, C. & Zheng, S., (2020). “Analysis of the influence factors of online teaching on the psychological status of the students in Vocational Colleges during the epidemic of COVID-19”. In: 2020 7th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE): 316-322. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9532239.
- Parfenova, A. & Romashova, S., (2020). “The role of procrastination in students’ consumer behavior: Budget planning and impulse buying”. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(1/2): 133-144. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijssp-10-2019-0199/full/html
- Peixoto, E. M., Pallini, A. C., Vallerand, R. J., Rahimi, S. & Silva, M. V., (2021). “The role of passion for studies on academic procrastination and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Soc Psychol Educ. 24(3): 877-893. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09636-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-021-09636-9 
- Pirouzan, A., (2011). Academic Literacy and the Iranian University. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (in Persian)
- Roshanzadeh M., Tajabadi A. & Mazhari Dehkordi Bahareh, M. S., (2014). “Investigating the predictive effect of internet addiction on academic procrastination among nursing students”. Modern Medical Informatics, 8(1): 35-26. http://jmis.hums.ac.ir/article-1-344-en.html (in Persian)
- Rozental, A. & Carlbring, P., (2014). “Understanding and treating procrastination: A review of a common self-regulatory failure”. Psychology, 5(13): 1488. https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.513160
- Saplavska, J. & Jerkunkova, A., (2018). “Academic Procrastination and Anxiety Among Students”. In: Engineering for Rural Development–International Scientific Conference. https://dx.doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N357 (1192-1197).
- Sari, W. L. & Fakhruddiana, F., (2019). “Internal Locus of Control, Social Support and Academic Procrastination among Students in Completing the Thesis”. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2): 363-368. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/17043/0
- Sharapour, M., (2006). Sociology of Education. Tehran: Organization for Study and Compilation of University Humanities Textbooks (SAMAT),  https://www.iase-jrn.ir/?lang=en (in Persian)
- Soleimani, E., Narouei, Y., Fattahi, S. & Moghadam, A., (2017). “The relationship between academic procrastination and its dimensions with internet addiction in students with regard to gender and Iranian culture”. First International Conference on Culture, Psychopathology and Education, Tehran. https://iahsj.kaums.ac.ir/article_174396_77d7376e119095231e914aa858117e77.pdf (in Persian)
- Steel, P., (2007). “The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential selfregulatory failure”. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (1): 65-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65. 
- Tarkar, P., (2020). “Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Education System”. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29: 3812-3814. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Preeti-Tarkar/publication/352647439_Impact_Of_Covid-19_Pandemic_On_Education_System/links/60d1e909299bf19b8d99d279/Impact-Of-Covid-19-Pandemic-On-Education-System.pdf
- Toquero, C. M., (2020). “Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context”. Pedagogical Research, 5, Article No. em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1263557.pdf
- Wang, Q., Xin, Z., Zhang, H., Du, J. & Wang, M., (2022). “The effect of the supervisor–student relationship on academic procrastination: the chain-mediating role of academic self-efficacy and learning adaptation”. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(5): 2621. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2621.
- Wieland, L. M., Hoppe, J. D., Wolgast, A. & Ebner-Priemer, U. W., (2022). “Task ambiguity and academic procrastination: An experience sampling approach”. Learning and Instruction, 81 (101595): 107-149. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101595.
- Yeghi, R., (2016). Alienation: New Directions in Critical Theory. translated by: Ahmad Tadayin, Tehran: Donyaye Eqtesad Press.https://www.amazon.com/Alienation-New-Directions-Critical-theory/dp/0231151993 (in Persian)
- Zakai, M. S. & Esmaeili, M. J., (2015). Youth and Academic and Academic Alienation. Tehran: Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute. https://dx.doi.org/10.7508/ijcr.2011.16.003 (in Persian)
Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research
Volume 13, Issue 25
March 2025
Pages 299-340

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics