Sociological Analysis of Urban Society Dynamics Based on the Strategic Spirituality of Entrepreneurs

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Economic Sociology and Development, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student of Economic Sociology and Development, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran (Corresponding Author).

Abstract

Abstract
What are the dimensions of urban dynamics is the study motivation of this article. The purpose of this is to present a different perspective on how to analyze social dynamism in the urban space. “How can self-socialization of citizens affect the dynamics and sustainable development of a city?” By reflecting on the stated question, one can realize the special importance of this article. In this context, the information baggage of two sociology treatises was used by adopting the secondary analysis method. These treatises were done with a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in the cities of Tehran and Arak; But based on the problem plan of this article, the result indicates that urban life can have a dynamic atmosphere according to important dimensions such as: diverse opportunities for comfort and social health, reducing damages, improving environmental health, etc. In addition to a dynamic city, it is necessary to adopt policies in the “cultural field” of the society so that the social self of the citizens is activated towards the expression of responsibility, competencies and abilities. In this field, the participation of entrepreneurial activists in different fields should be used. What supports the self-social dynamics of citizenship is the active campaign of entrepreneurs who have.
Keywords: Dynamic City, Development, Responsible Citizen.
 
1. Introduction
What order and level of coordination the city’s movement has with responsible and self-aware activists, and what aspects of the density of the city’s material capital are compatible with the city’s social and cultural capital is a challenge that if For that, he expressed the appropriate and needed answers and theories, so that it is possible to get closer to the rules of dynamics and social and cultural development of the city. How can we create an atmosphere of dynamism in the contemporary city that, in fact, the city without the need of political and government affiliations, can light up and power its own development engine. The goal is to analyze and represent the quality of urban dynamics leading to real development in contemporary cities. The dynamic social self-agency of citizens in the city reduces environmental damage and pollution (weather and natural landscapes) and socio-psychological pains of citizens in many scenes and conditions. What is more important than witnessing manifestations of diversity, dynamism and individual-social dynamism, satisfaction, native creative identity in modern urban life so that the black dust of monotony, boredom, alienation and indifference can be removed from the image and atmosphere of the contemporary city. Perhaps it can be said that reaching such a destination is the most important goal for successful urban management and planning.
 
2. Materials and Methods
In this article, the combination of information from two research works is used; The first is a sociological research in one of Tehran’s neighborhoods (area 2) around sustainable urban development, and the second is a research work on the issue of strategic spirituality of active entrepreneurs in the urban society (Arak) which is expressed with a preliminary basis on the issue of dynamics in harmony with development Urban has become a new and different approach and analysis. In this article, focusing on the secondary analysis method, three methods have been used in a combined manner: documentary study method, survey method, qualitative data foundation method.
 
3. Data
Based on the opinions and findings of this article, self-socialization forms an important part of the parameter of trust in plans and decision-making structures of the urban area and is effective in citizens’ sense of belonging. Self-socialization by forming very strong communication networks, guaranteeing the effectiveness of programs or their failure, and organizing the wave of urban development and dynamics in the social dimension (employment, education, security, participation, equal opportunities, sense of belonging, etc.), The economic dimension (growth, justice, efficiency, etc.) and the environmental dimension (urban environment, protection of urban natural resources, etc.) help. In other words, the self-social (citizen) with its characteristics must interact with the social structure. The major and significant part of this structure includes the two dimensions of responsibility and social competence. Urban development and dynamism can be seen as a process that is able to be realized under the banner of self-society. In general, if the self-socialization of citizens is improved, by increasing the level of trust building through delegating responsibility, their sense of belonging and participation will also increase. This process ultimately leads to urban prosperity and dynamics through improving the level of self-awareness, increasing self-esteem, self-efficacy, trust and strengthening internal links. In addition, the growth and development of the green and dynamic self-social citizenship tree is in the light of the active role of entrepreneurs who actually have a kind of spirituality: beliefs, values and a non-traditional attitude. Entrepreneurs who firmly and sustainably play a role in the direction of important values such as cooperation, job creation, cooperation, social solidarity, responsibility, competence, social trust, trustworthiness, etc.; And therefore, they establish healthy and reinforcing norms in the urban space. Because what they say and believe, they also act in the objective field of civil relations of the city; Therefore, they are effective and can set an example. What better strategy than an active group of such entrepreneurs who can save and rid a city of all kinds of ruptures, wilting, disorders and disturbances (social, psychological, environmental, etc.).
 
4. Discussion
According to C. Wright Mills, one of the most important social problems of today’s societies is the reduction of the sense of altruism, especially in urban societies (Elwell, F, 2002). For this reason, paying attention to the issue of altruism and how to strengthen it in social relations is very important. Research has shown that there is a positive relationship between spirituality and overall levels of higher physical and mental health, better coping skills, increased life expectancy, and higher levels of life satisfaction(Brotheridge C.M. and..., 2007; 4 (3): 287-309).  Among the empirical findings, there is a common root argument that “spirituality - meaning the growth and promotion of personal and social self-awareness”, is not something that is exclusive to man and isolates him from the outside world, and causes a tremendous increase in the life force in man.
 
5. Conclusion
The development of urban dynamics can be seen as a process that is able to be realized under the banner of self-society. If the self-socialization of citizens is improved, their sense of belonging and participation will also increase by increasing the level of trust building through delegating responsibility. This process ultimately leads to urban prosperity and development through improving the level of self-awareness, increasing self-esteem, self-efficacy, trust and strengthening internal links. The self-social dynamics of citizenship is in the light of the active role of entrepreneurs who actually have a kind of spirituality: non-traditional beliefs, values and attitudes. Entrepreneurs who firmly and sustainably play a role in the direction of important values such as cooperation, job creation, cooperation, social solidarity, responsibility, competence, social trust, trustworthiness, etc.; And therefore, they establish healthy and reinforcing norms in the urban space. What supports the self-social dynamics of citizenship is the active campaign of entrepreneurs who have overcome alienation and individual speculation with non-traditional beliefs, values and attitudes towards important values such as cooperation, job creation, social work, social solidarity, and responsibility. , social trust, trustworthiness, etc., have harmonious actions and words. Because what they say and believe, they also act in the objective field of civil relations of the city; Therefore, they are effective and can set an example.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

- آریان‌پور، امیرحسین، (1357 ). رساله‌ای در آستانه رستاخیز. دارای نسخه الکترونیک در اینترنت.
- ابراهیم‌زاده، عیسی؛ و زارع، محمد، (1393). «سنجش میزان سرمایۀ اجتماعی، مشارکت و توسعۀ پایدار شهری». نشریۀ جغرافیا و آمایش شهری، منطقه‌ای، 4 (11): 15-30. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2014.1540
- احدنژادروشتی، محسن؛ یاری‌‌‌قلی، وحید؛ و اوجاقلو، روح‌‌‌الله، (1393). «نقش سرمایۀ اجتماعی در توسعۀ پایدار محلی (مورد مطالعه: محله نارمک تهران)». مطالعات جامعه‌‌‌شناختی شهری. 4 (12): 50-25. https://journals.iau.ir/article_641182.html
- ازکیا،مصطفی؛ و غفاری،غلامرضا، (1388). جامعه‌شناسی توسعه. تهران: انتشارات کیهان، چاپ4.
- امام‌جمعه، فرهاد، (1395). جامعه‌شناسی فرهنگی. تهران: انتشارات بهمن برنا، چاپ5
- امام‌جمعه، فرهاد، (1386). موانع جامعه‌شناختی توسعۀ صنعتی در ایران. اراک: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اراک.
- پیران، پرویز، (1392). مبانی مفهومی و نظری سرمایۀ اجتماعی. تهران: نشر علم. 
- ترابی، علی‌اکبر، (1351). جامعه‌شناسی و دینامیسم اجتماع. تبریز: انتشارات نوبل(چاپ دوم).
- تقوایی، مسعود؛ و صفرآبادی، اعظم، (1392). «توسعۀ پایدار شهری و برخی عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مورد مطالعه: شهر کرمانشاه)». مطالعات جامعه‌‌‌شناختی شهری، 3 (6): 22-1.  
- تنهایی، حسین ابوالحسن، (1383). درآمدی بر مکاتب و نظریه‌های جامعه‌شناسی. مشهد: انتشارات مرندیز. 
- توکلی‌‌‌نیا، جمیله؛ اسکندرپور، مجید؛ و برغمدی، مجتبی، (1391). «درآمدی بر حکمروایی خوب شهری: ضرورت‌ها، الزامات و چالش‌های فراروی تحقق آن در ایران». فصلنامۀ نگرش‌‌‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 5 (1): 152-135.
- حاتمی‌‌‌نژاد، حسین؛ پوراحمد، احمد؛ و عیوضلو، داود، (1393). «واکاوی ظرفیت سرمایۀ اجتماعی شهری محلات شهری در سامان‌‌‌دهی بافت‌‌‌های فرسوده، مطالعه موردی: منطقۀ 9 شهرداری تهران». فصلنامۀ آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 4 (13): 93-67. https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_8504.html
- حسنی‌کاخکی، احمد؛ و ‌‌‌قلی‌‌‌پور، آرین، (1386). «رفتار شهروندی سازمانی: گامی دیگر در جهت بهبود عملکرد سازمان در قبال مشتری». فصلنامه پژوهش‌‌‌نامه بازرگانی. موسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌‌‌های بازرگانی. وزارت بازرگانی، 45: 145-115. https://pajooheshnameh.itsr.ir/article_700797.html
- درویشی، محمدرسول؛ قائدی، محمدرضا؛ کشیشیان‌سیرکی، گارینه؛ و توحیدفام، محمد، (1399). «تحلیلی بر توسعۀ پایدار شهری با تکیه‌بر شاخصه‌های سرمایۀ اجتماعی و اعتماد عمومی (نمونه موردی: منطقۀ 2 شهر تهران)». فصلنامۀ پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 40: 216-201. https://jupm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_4007.html
- رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ و شالی، محمد، (1391). «تحلیل فضایی سطح توسعه یافتگی تهران به تفکیک مناطق شهری». فصلنامه برنامه ریزی و آمایش فضا، 16 (4): 49-25. https://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=5052&sid=21&slc_lang=fa
- ریتزر، جرج، (1393). نظریۀ جامعه‌شناسی در دورۀ معاصر. ترجمۀ محسن ثلاثی، تهران: انتشارات علمی، چاپ نوزدهم.
- روشه، گی، (1395). تغییرات اجتماعی. ترجمۀ منصور وثوقی، تهران: نشر نی، چاپ بیست و ششم.
- شارع‌پور، محمود، (1387). جامعه‌شناسی شهری. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
- شیخ‌الاسلامی، علیرضا؛ ببراز کریمی، و اقبالی، رضا، (1388). «ارزیابی توسعۀ پایدار شهری کلان‌شهر شیراز». فصلنامۀ جغرافیایی چشم‌انداز زاگرس، 1 (2).
- صالحی‌امیری، سید رضا؛ قدمی، محسن؛ و بیگ‌زاده، یوسف، (1391). «طراحی و ارائه الگو جهت سنجش تأثیر سرمایۀ اجتماعی بر ابعاد توسعۀ پایدار». نشریه فرا سوی مدیریت، 23: 15-38. https://journals.iau.ir/article_519427.html
- صفایی‌پور، مسعود؛ مرادی‌منفرد، سمیرا؛ و امیری، محمدرضا، (1395). «ارزیابی و اولویت بندی شاخص‌های توسعۀ پایدار شهری با استفاده از مدل تحلیل شبکه ANP، مورد شناسی: شهر زنجان». فصلنامۀ جغرافیا و آمایش شهری-منطقه‌ای، 6 (19): 159-143. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2016.2499
- فیاضی، سیده مریم، (1395). «تأثیر سرمایۀ اجتماعی بر توسعۀ پایدار شهری، مطالعۀ موردی شهر لنبان اصفهان». چهارمین کنگرۀ بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و توسعۀ شهری، تهران، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
- قراملکی‌قدردان، محمدحسن، (1380). سکولاریزم در اسلام و مسیحیت. قم: انتشارات بوستان، چاپ 2.
- کاظمیان غلامرضا؛ و شفیعا، سعید، (1393). «بررسی رابطۀ سرمایۀ اجتماعی ساکنان شمیران نو با پایداری توسعه». مجلۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، 11 (2: 24): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v11i2.17187
- کوششی، پریش، (1395). جستجوی در گوگل؛ «اقتباس ایده و نظر دربارۀ الگو و بینش روش‌شناختی ویتگنشتاین»، لودیگ.
- کماسی، حسین؛ و حسینی، سید علی، (1393). «تبیین رابطه بین مدیریت شهری و سرمایۀ اجتماعی شهروندان، (مطالعه موردی: محله ولیعصر شمالی)». مجلۀ برنامه‌ریزی فضایی(جغرافیا)، 14: 135-156. https://sppl.ui.ac.ir/article_16006.html
- محسنی‌تبریزی، علیرضا؛ و آقامحسنی، مریم، (1389). «بررسی نقش سرمایۀ اجتماعی در توسعۀ شهری؛ مورد پژوهی: شهر محلات». فصلنامۀ مدیریت شهری، 8 (26): 162-147. 
- معدنی‌پور، مهد، (1395). «تأثیر مشارکت اجتماعی شهروندان بر توسعۀ پایدار محلات شهر ماهدشت». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد صفادشت. 
- موسوی، میرنجف؛ قنبری، ‌حکیمه؛ و اسماعیل‌زاده، خالد، (1391). «تحلیل فضایی رابطۀ سرمایۀ اجتماعی و توسعۀ پایدار شهری». فصلنامۀ جغرافیا و توسعه، 10 (27): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2012.273
- Ahdanjad Roshti, M., Yari-Qoli, V. & Ojaklou, R., (2013). “The role of social capital in local sustainable development (case study: Narmak neighborhood of Tehran)”. Urban sociological studies, 5 (12): 25-50.
- Arianpour, A., (1996). A treatise on the verge of resurrection. with an electronic version on the Internet.
- Azkiya, M. & Ghaffari, Gh., (2009). “Sociology of Development”. Tehran: Kayhan Publications, 4th edition.
- Bakhurst, D. & Sypnowich, C., (1995). The Social Self, SAGE Publications. London: Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
- Balog A., Baker M. & LaKami T., (2014). “Religiosity and spirituality in entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda”. Journal of Managemen, 11(2): 159-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.836127
- Barker, R. L. (1995). “The social work dictionary”. 3rded. Washington DC: NASW Press. 1995.
- Beetham, D., (2018). Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics. London: Publisher PolityPress; 2018.
- Bennett, M. & Sani, F., (2004). “The development of the social self, Chapter 1, Introduction: Children and social identity”. Psychology Press: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391099
- Brewer, M. B. & Gardner, W., (1996). “Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self representations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
- Brotheridge C. M. & Lee, R. T., (2007). “Hand to work, heart to god: religiosity and organ izational behavior”. Journal of manage-ment, spirituality & religion, 4 (3): 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080709518666
- Bullis R. K., (1996). Spirituality in social work practice. Washington DC: Taylor & Francis.
- Burger, P., Berger, B. & Hansfried, K., (2002). The Homeless Mind, Modernization and Awareness. Trans-lated by: Mohammad Savoji. second: Tehran: nia.
- Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Lavelle, L.F., Katz, I.M., Heine, S.J., & Lehman, D. R., (1996). “Self-concept clarity: Meas-urement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 141-56. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.141
- Candland, C., (2000). “Faith as social capital: religion and community development in SouthernAsia”. Policy sciences, 33 (3): 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004857811117
- Castells, M., (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. vol. 1, first Ed. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
- Cole, H., (1968). “The Entrepreneur: Introductory Remarks”. American Review of Economics, LVIII-2: 64-71.
- Crowe, J., (2008). “Economic development in the nonmetropolitan West: The influence of built, natural, and social capital”. Journal of the Community Development Society, 39(4): 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330809489658
- Dana, L. P., (2010). Entrepreneurship and religion. Cheltenham. UK Publishing: Edward Elgar.
- Darvishi, M. R., Qaidi, M., Sirki Priests, G. & Tohifam, M., (2019). “An analysis of sustainable urban development based on the indicators of social capital and public trust (case example: District 2 of Tehran)”. Urban Research and Planning Quarterly, 40: 216-201.
- Das, P., (2004). “Women’s Participation in community -level Water Governance in Urban India: The Gap between Motiva-tion and Ability”. world Development, 64: 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.025
- Delbecq, A. L., (1999). “Christian spirituality and contemporary business leadership”. Journal of Organizational Change Manage-ment,12(4): 345. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910282180
- Ebrahimzadeh, I. & Mohammad, Z., (2013). “Measuring the amount of social capital, participation and sustainable ur-ban development”. Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, Regional, 11, Summer 2019.
- Egger, S., (2006). “Determining a sustainable city model”. Environmental modeling and Software, 21(9): 1235-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.012
- Elkins, D. N., (1998). Beyond religion: A personal program for building a spiritual life outside the walls of traditional religion. Wheaton, IL: The Theosophical Publishing house. 
- Elwell, F., (2002). “The sociology of wright Mills”. Qualitative Sociology, 25(3): 337-43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016029812807
- Emamjome, F., (2007). Sociological barriers to industrial development in Iran. Arak: Arak Islamic Azad University Publications.
- Emamjome, F., (2015). Cultural Sociology. Tehran: Bahman Barna Publications, 5th edition.
- Fayazi, S. M., (2015). “The impact of social capital on sustainable urban development, a case study of the city of Lanban, Isfahan”. The 4th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University.
- Fernández-Zabala, A., Rodríguez-Fernández, A. & Goñi, A., (2016). “The structure of the Social Self-Concept (SSC) Question-naire”. Anales de psicologíavol, 32 (1): 199-205. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.193931
- Fox, R., (1997). The Physical Self: From Motivation to Well- Being. Illinois, Human Kinetics Publisher.
- Hagen, E. E. (2009). “How economic growth begins: A theory of social change”. Journal of Social Issues. 1963; 19(1)(Accessed:17 Nov 2009) Availableat: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00428.x
- Hal Sirkin, J. W., (2008). Hemerling, Arindam Bhattacharya.[Globality: Competing with Everyone from Everywhere for Every-thing. New York, Grand Central Publishing.
- Hall, P., (1993). “Toward Sustainable, Liveable and Innovative cities for 21st century”. In: Proceedings of the Third confer-ence of the World Capitals, Tokyo: 22-28.
- Hall, T., (2006). Urban Geography. 3rd edition, Routledge, London and New York.
- Hataminejad, H., Pourahmad, A. & Ayuzlu, D., (2013). “Analyzing the capacity of urban social capital of urban neighborhoods in organizing dilapidated structures, case study: District 9 of Tehran Municipality”. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Survey of Space, 4 (13): 93-67.
- Hervoljeh, D., (2001). “Transfer and formation of religious social identities in modernity”. (Persian) Translated by: Mahmoud Nejati-Hosseini, Research Quarterly, 5: 20-21.
- Hosna Kakhki, A. & Qalipour, A., (2007). “Corporate citizenship behavior: another step towards improving the performance of the organization towards the customer”. Quarterly Journal of Business Research, Business Studies and Re-search Institute. Ministry of Commerce, 45: 115-145.
- Hunt, D., (2014). Economic Theories of Development. 1989. Gholamreza Azad Armaki (persian) Trans. Third Edition. Tehran: Nee Publishing.
- Inglehart, R., (1997). “Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214429
- Jackson, M., (1983). “An analys of max weber,s Theory of ethnicity”. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations”. Department of Sociology. Humboldt State University: 4-18.
- Kamasi, H. & Hosseini, S. A., (2013). “Clarifying the relationship between urban management and citizens’ so-cial capital, (Case study: Northern Waliasr neighborhood)”. Spatial Planning Journal (Geography), 14: 135-156.
- Kayed, R. N. & Hassan, M. K. (2010). “Islamic entrepreneurship: a case study of Saudi Arabia”. Journal ofdevelopmental entrepre-neurship, 15 (4): 379-413. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946710001634
- Kazemian, Gh. & Shafia, S., (2013). “Investigating the relationship between the social capital of the residents of Shemiran Nou and the sustainability of development”. Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Fall and Winter.
- Kihlstrom, J. F., Albright, J. S., Klein, S. B., Cantor, N., Chew, B. R., & Neidenthal, P. M., (1988). “Information processing and the study of the self”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 145-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60226-9
- King J. E. & Williamson, IO., (2005). “Workplace religious expression religiosity and job satisfaction: clarifying a relationship”. Journal of management, Spirituality & religion, 2 (2): 173-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080509518579
- King-Kauanui, S. K., (2008). “Exploring entrepreneurship through the lens of spirituality”. Journal of management, spirituality & reli-gion, 5 (2): 160-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080809518698
- Kinjerski V. M. & Skrypnek, B. J., (2004). “Defining spirit at work: finding common ground”. Journal of organizational change management, 17 (1): 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410511288
- kosheshi, P., (2015). Search in Google; Adapting the idea and opinion about the model and methodological insight of Wittgenstein. Ludwig (Wittgenstein, L, 1951).
- Lehmann D., (2010). Development theory: four critical studies. 1st Edition. London: Routedge;2010.
- Leman, E. & Cox, J. E., (1991). “Sustainable urban development: strategic considerations for urbanizations”. Ekistics, 58 (348/349):  216-224.
- Li, F., Liu, X., Hu, D., Wang, R., Yang, W., Li, D. & Zhao, D., (2009). “Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China’s Jining City”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90 (3-4): 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.022
- Lynch, K., (2011). Rural-urban Interaction in the developing world. Rout Ledge, London.
- Mandaripour, M., (2015). “The impact of citizens’ social participation on the sustainable development of Mahdasht neighborhoods”. Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Safadasht branch.
- Maru, Y.T., Ryan, R. J. & Allister, M., (2007). “Modeling community interactional and Social Capital dynamics: The case of regional and rural communities of Australia”. Agricultural System, 92: 179- 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.03.005
- McCall, G. J. & Simmons, J. L., (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free press
- Mensah, J., (2019). “Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review” Cogent Social Sciences, 5: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
- Mitroff, I. & Denton, E. A., (1999). “A study of spirituality in the workplace”. Sloan Management, 40: 83-92.
- Mohseni Tabrizi, A. & Aghamohseni, M., (2010). “Examining the role of social capital in urban development; Research case: Shahr Mahalat”. Urban Management Quarterly, 8 (26): 147-162.
- Morris, M. & Schindehutte, M., (2005). “Entrepreneurial values and the ethnic enterprise: an examination of six subcultures”. Journal of small business management, 43 (4): 453-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00147.x
- Mousavi, M., Ghanbari, H. & Ismailzadeh, Kh., (2011). “Spatial analysis of the relationship between so-cial capital and sustainable urban development”. Geography and Development Quarterly, 10 (27).
- Nafisa, I., (2013). “The relative importance of spirituality in entrepreneurship development among graduates of Nigerian tertiary institutions”. International Journal of Business, 2(4): 22-48.
- Naude, W., (2013). “Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: Theory, Evidence and Policy UNU-MERIT and MGSoG”. University of Maastricht and IZA DP. 7505. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2314802
- Pawar, P., (2013). “Social Sciences Perspectives on Entrepreneurship”. Developing Country Studies, 3(9): 25.
- Penman, J., (2012). “Motivations driving spiritual engagement based on a phenomenological study of spirituality amongst palliative care clients and caregivers”. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 2(3): 135-147. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v2n3p135
- Piran, P., (2012). Conceptual and theoretical foundations of social capital. Tehran: Alam Publishing.
- Putnam, R. D., (1995). “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Cap ital”. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1): 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
- Qaramaleki Ghadrdan, M. H., (2001). Secularism in Islam and Christianity. Qom: Bostan Publications, 2nd edition.
- Rafiyan, M. & Shali, M., (2011). “Spatial analysis of Tehran’s development level by urban areas”. Space Planning and Planning Quarterly, 16 (4): 25-49.
- Rao, S. S. & Singh, S., (2018). “Max Weber’s Contribution to the Sociology of Education: A Critical Appreciation, Contemporary Education Dialogue”. SAGE Publications Ltd., 15(1): 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184917744964
- Reck, A., (1964). Selective Writings, George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago press
- Ritzer, G., (2013). Sociological theory in the contemporary era. translated by Mohsen Talasi, Tehran: Scientific Pub-lications, 19th edition.
- Roche, G., (2015). Social changes. translated by Mansour Vothouqi, Tehran: Ney Publishing, twenty-sixth edition.
- Ruble, D. N., Alvarez, J., Bachman, M., Cameron, J., Fuligni, A., Coll, C. C. & Rhee, E., (2004). “The development of the social self”. Chapter 2, the development of a sense of we: The emergence and implications of children’s collective identity, Psy-chology Press. Pp: 29-76.
- Safaipour, M., Moradi Monfared, S. & Amiri, M., (2015). “Evaluation and prioritization of sus-tainable urban development indicators using the ANP network analysis model, case study: Zanjan city”. Quarterly of Geog-raphy and Urban-Regional Planning, 6 (19): 143-159.
- Salehi Amiri, S. R., Gadami, M. & Beyzadeh, Y., (2011). “Designing and presenting a model to measure the impact of social capital on the dimensions of sustainable development”. Fara Soy Management Journal, 23.
- Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. & Bridges, M. W., (1994). “Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(6): 1063-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063
- Schjoedt, L. & Shaver, K. G., “Deciding on an entrepreneurial career: a test of the pull and push hypotheses using the pan-el study of entrepreneurial dynamics data”. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31 (5): 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00197.x
- Schjoedt, L. & Shaver, K. G., “Deciding on an entrepreneurial career: a test of the pull and push hypotheses using the pan-el study of entrepreneurial dynamics data”. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31 (5): 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00197.x
- Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. (Revised editions in 1961).
- Serpe, R. T., (1987). “Stability and Change in Self: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Explanation”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50 (1): 44-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786889
- Sharapour, M., (2008). Urban Sociology. Tehran: Somit Publications. 
- Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C., (1976). “Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations”. Review of Educational Research, 46 (3): 407-441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
- Sheikhul-Islami, A., Karimi, B. & Iqbali, R., (2009). “Evaluation of sustainable urban development of Shiraz metropolis”. Zagros Landscape Quarterly, 1 (2): winter.
- Sheridan, M. J. & Amato-von Hemer, K., (1999). “The role of religion and spirituality in social work education and practice: A survey of student views and experiences”. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1): 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1999.10778952
- Solitude, H. A., (2004). An introduction to sociological schools and theories. Mashhad: Marandiz Publica-tions.
- Stets, J. S. & Burke, P. J., (2003). “A sociological approach to self and identity”. In: Handbook of Self and Identity, Eds. Mark R. Leary and June Price Tangney, Guilford Press: 128-152.
- Strauss Anselm, C. J., (2008). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods. Translated by Buick Mohammadi. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2015.
- Stryker, S., (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A Social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjaminb Cummings McCall, G. J. and Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free press.
- Tagvai, M. & Safarabadi, A., (2012). “Sustainable urban development and some factors affecting it (case study: Kermanshah city)”. Urban sociological studies, 3 (6): 1-22.
- Toklinia, J., Iskanderpour, M. & Barghamadi, M., (2012). “An Introduction to Good Urban Governance: Ne-cessities, Requirements and Challenges for Its Realization in Iran”. New Attitudes Quarterly in Human Geography, (5 (1): 135-152.
- Torabi, A. A., (1972). Sociology and Community Dynamics. Tabriz: Nobel Publications (2nd edition).
- Webb, R., et al., (2018). “Sustainable urban systems: Co-design and framing for transformation”. Ambio, 47: 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
- Woodhead, L., (2010). “Real Religion Fuzzy Spirituality? Taking Sides in the Sociology of Religion”. In: Aupers S Houtman D editors Religions of Modernity: Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital, Leiden: Brill, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004184510.i-273.13
- Woolcock, M. & Narayan, D., (2000). “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy”. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2): 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
- Woolfolk, A. E., (1993). Educational Psychology. 5th Ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Ziller, R. C., (1973). The Social Self: Pergamon General Psychology Series. New York: Pergamon Press.
Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research
Volume 13, Issue 24
September 2024
Pages 213-252

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics